Using the NPC Human Female as a base, I digitally inked the piece and then thought that it might make a good first animation test. Not great, but it’s my first animation:
Human or Near-Human NPC character art. I am considering using this as a basis for a quick animation test.
Also seen at: http://xechon.deviantart.com/art/Random-Girl-475345049
Not Luc Besson’s best work. I can review the entire movie in one spoilerriffic paragraph, after the break:
A fun slider-bar style landing simulator for the Curiosity Rover. Think you can land her? Give it a try!
It can be done! Took me a good 10 tries though…
Anyone else remember Traveller, known by many names over many editions and alternate universes, the semi-hard sci-fi RPG of legend?
Well, someone has decided to make a TV-pilot set in one of those iterations:
Spinward Traveller is classic science-fiction; a compelling story of misfits and heroes struggling to survive in the vast sea of stars that is the Traveller role-playing game universe. Based on Marc Miller’s award-winning RPG Traveller, our story captures the essence of role-playing; of characters who have to work together in order to succeed. We wanted to stay true to Marc Miller’s vision of the far future, and we have recruited cast and crew who are passionate about the Traveller RPG and getting the story atmosphere right. Making any show is expensive; making sci-fi is doubly so. We’ll have hundreds of people and thousands of person-hours involved just for the 22 minute version.
Sounds good to me! Check out the kickstarter.
Attention on deck for legal recitations! *ahem*
Wildstar MMOPRG is a product of NCSOFT. © 2014 NCSOFT Corporation. All rights reserved. All trademarks referenced herein are the properties of their respective owners. All images from the Open Beta 12 May to 18 May 2014. http://www.wildstar-online.com
At ease. Now that the Admiralty is happy, we can get on to business. Namely: what is Wildstar, how was it, and will I be playing it. So let’s get right into it.
Wildstar is a pretty standard 2 faction MMORPG produced from the same folks that brought us Guild Wars 1 and 2, making it your usual runny-questy-killy-levely game. Rumor has it was designed mainly by a group of WoW devs fresh from Blizzard, and the game design shows the lineage. It’s fresher than WoW for sure, not nearly as blocky, but still retains a strong cartoonish look to the whole thing. Cross that with a far-future space cowboy motif (someone watched a lot of Firefly) and you’ve got the makings for a game that barely takes itself seriously but has all the more fun because of it.
As always, I’ll be keeping this as spoiler-free as possible. The Captain hates spoilers!
The short version:
The movie was great, go see it! But read the book first to fill in the missing internal monologues. Imagine, if you will, watching Dune without the voice-overs. Yeah. So read the book and go see the film, enjoy
The long version:
I was first introduced to The Hunger Games at Comic-Con by Nancy during a fun charge through the main floor to try to secure a mockingjay pin from their booth. While an unsuccessful hunt, I was still struck by her enthusiasm. She encouraged me to read the series before the movie came out, and by this point I trust her opinion such that I’ll read “On The Watching Of Paint Dry” if she recommends it as good. As it turns out, the series is excellent! Sure, it’s a Young Adult series, but don’t hold that against it too harshly. What do you think Harry Potter started as?
The Good: Say what you will, but I thought the casting was done well. They’re good looking without being *too* good looking, and whomever cast Lenny Kravitz as Cinna should win an award. Like right now, hand it over to them–he nailed Cinna. The perfect mix of sadness, hope, and almost-fatherly love. Additionally, the scenery is worth pausing the movie for just to admire: the coal town is gritty and destitute, the hob looks like any market in the 3rd world, and the crowd scenes of The Capitol would make any Roman nod in approval. Ego amare purpura capillos!
The Bad: So why did I mention the book so much? Because to get the full effect of the movie, you’re going to want to of read the book first. On its own, the film stands as a slightly choppy, fast-paced, pseudo-documentary, art house action film. Good times I say! But, as mentioned above, better if you have the missing internal dialogues from the book to fill in EXACTLY what Katniss is thinking in any given scene. There is so much happening in the background with the tactics, the trying to figure out what people want her to do, and the terrible emotional struggle that the movie simply does not have time to get into.
The Ugly: How do you fit a book with this much detail into only 2.5 hours? This will make an excellent mini-series someday, but for now we have a movie trying to jam in a massive about of fine details into too short of time. The result is a film that feels rushed, almost jumpy. I can see a viewer getting lost if they haven’t read the books to fill in the gaps. I had previously complained that the book was too fast paced, making the movie seem to be like watching a highlights reel by comparison. Also, one bad moment of CG (ugh) and a poorly done pyro sequence. But I’m nitpicking.
The Beautiful: The sound. Or, should I say in many cases, the LACK of sound. Wonderful, nay, devastating in some scenes. There’s barely any soundtrack to distract from what is nearly an art-film. There are a couple scenes where the sudden absence of sound or the overriding sound that Katniss is hearing does what no soundtrack could ever do to push through the emotion of the scene. Some say that the way it was filmed, the closeups intermixed with long shots, was distracting. But, personally, it reminded me of Kurosawa–and Kurosawa is GOD. So I’ll mark the style down as artistic once you get used to it.
Overall? Go see it! Read the book first! Maybe we can get #2 and #3 made….
I also wanted to say that this Team Peeta and Team Gale thing is stupid. Her feelings for them are not that cut and dry. Sure the movie doesn’t have time to go into it, but in the books it’s more than clear the struggle she’s going through with her feeling for both of them. It’s just a Twilight simplification of a significantly more complex and believable love triangle.
The Captain has spoken, back to your stations!
I have sometimes made comment about how I end up learning the oddest things while GMing. Generally speaking, when I sit down to plan out a campaign or upcoming session, I try to make it a believable as possible. I certainly hold myself to a higher standard than Hollywood! I have found myself researching Napoleonic infantry formations for use in Mecha games, quantum physics for use explaining hyperdrives, evolution of languages for a game set during the Crusades, European and Asian heraldry for use in East meets West steampunk setting, various phrases in many languages for any number of games, and a hundred other odd topics.
Even so, you’re still not going to be an expert in the topic! However, I’ve found that knowing something about the topic is better than completely making crap up when it comes to portraying a given thing in your game setting. Why make up some babble that sounds sort of French when you could grab a cheap phrasebook and actually learn a few real phrases? The party going to be in turn of the century London? Go look up a few articles about famous buildings and people of the time. Mentioning a popular kids game, juicy scandal, or political debate from the time period can really help get Players immersed in the setting.
Try to do the best you can, enjoy learning new things, and try to make the setting as realistic as possible (with respect to the style of setting itself, of course). The trick, as with many things, is to not over do it! There’s a balance between having the party’s Cop/Detective Player fill out a printed form on the crime scene (fun!) and making the Player learn every single facet of criminal law (boring!) If your Players start looking like the Economics class in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off you’ve gone too far. Dial it back some, abstract the paperwork or procedures with a Bureaucracy or Protocol roll. If the character knows the skills and the Player doesn’t, that’s fine. That’s sort of the point of role-playing. Let the story unfold and keep the action moving! Even Tom Clancy himself would occasionally go into just a bit too much detail at the expense of keeping the story going. Sometimes you just have to say “Cool rifle bro, let’s not discuss the history of its bolt mechanism”. Well, not unless it’s the key to the murder mystery…
“A writer cannot do too much research… though sometimes it is a mistake to try and cram too much of what you learned into your novel. Research gives you a foundation to build on, but in the end it’s only the story that matters.” –George R.R. Martin
It’s a bit like that middle chapter in Snow Crash, the one where you learn the Complete History of Sumerian Mythology with a side of CDC Viral Biology Reports. It’s painful, it borders the very bleeding edge of what your audience can be expected to sit through, and it’s utterly needed for the plot to make any sense at all. A bit of a conundrum, really. It’s the sort of Info Dump that most GMs issue as Handout Packets, short stories, or the occasional “Go watch this movie before next session.” The key is to find out how much the Players are willing to follow/learn to enjoy the game. Showing your work that the Quantum Cosmic Teleportation Blinky Lights Machine is based on 36 hours of physics research you did is utterly irrelevant if the explanation isn’t critical to the plot or the Players are bored silly. Bored players blow stuff up. Probably using the Quantum Cosmic Teleportation Blinky Lights Machine.